James Miller points out that the most productive tax cuts will reduce marginal rates.
Giving workers a lump-sum payment does nothing to reduce marginal tax rates because everyone would still pay the same amount in taxes on their next dollar earned. Consequently, lump-sum payments don't reduce the negative economic effects of taxation. In contrast, reducing the Social Security tax increases most workers' after-tax take home pay for their next hour worked.
Miller also discusses the problem of reducing marginal tax rates for low-income taxpayers.
Government subsidies to the poor often decrease as income rises. Consequently, reducing subsidy penalties for the employed poor reduces marginal tax rates for the non-working poor.
Discussion Question. With subsidy programs, such as food stamps, the tendency is to phase out the subsidy quickly to avoid the expense of paying benefits to middle-class recipients. What does this do to marginal tax rates?
Copyright ©: 1999-2003,
Liberty Fund, Inc.
Great Questions of Economics: © 2002-2003, Arnold Kling. Originally published at http://arnoldkling.com/gqe/.
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 2.5.
The cuneiform inscription in the logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of
Lagash.
Picture of Arnold Kling courtesy of the author.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owners.
The URL for this site is:
http://www.econlib.org.
Please direct questions or comments about the website to
webmaster@econlib.org.