Should the government build a database on its citizens? I argue that this might be less intrusive than the alternatives.
Of course, a surveillance database will not work perfectly. However, neither does any other security measure. The criteria for evaluating a security measure should be its costs and benefits. The calculus is bound to be imprecise, but in a world of imperfect alternatives it is irrational to reject one particular approach just because it is imperfect.
Discussion Question. Is cost-benefit analysis an appropriate tool for dealing with issues such as terrorism and individual rights?
Copyright ©: 1999-2003,
Liberty Fund, Inc.
Great Questions of Economics: © 2002-2003, Arnold Kling. Originally published at http://arnoldkling.com/gqe/.
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 2.5.
The cuneiform inscription in the logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of
Lagash.
Picture of Arnold Kling courtesy of the author.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owners.
The URL for this site is:
http://www.econlib.org.
Please direct questions or comments about the website to
webmaster@econlib.org.