Home The Classics Recommended Readings Contributors' Forum Data and Research Recommended Links
Econlog Main | Archives | Permanent Links (Individual Articles) | Search
<< Previous | Long-term Deficits | Next >>

Long-term Deficits, 2003-01-14

David Warsh points to a short essay by Stephen Cecchetti on the need for long-term fiscal discipline.

We should restrict federal government revenues to the 40-year average of 19 percent of GDP and estimated public debt 75 years from now should not rise above 50 percent of GDP. All current and future tax or spending proposals should be evaluated relative to this objective.

Brad DeLong disagrees with this solution, and so do I. As an economist, I think that policy should be decided on the basis of cost-benefit analysis, not arbitrary accounting limits. My proposal for dealing with the long-term fiscal threat is to phase out Medicare.

Discussion Question. Other things equal, why would there be higher deadweight loss if the economy used government spending rather than private-sector resources to pay for health care?

Econlog Main | Archives | Help and FAQ
Top of Page

Copyright ©: 1999-2003, Liberty Fund, Inc.
Great Questions of Economics: © 2002-2003, Arnold Kling. Originally published at http://arnoldkling.com/gqe/.
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 2.5.

The cuneiform inscription in the logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
Picture of Arnold Kling courtesy of the author.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owners.
The URL for this site is: http://www.econlib.org. Please direct questions or comments about the website to webmaster@econlib.org.