In Paul Krugman's model, government spending is given, and tax cuts increase deficits.
It's O.K. to run a deficit during a recession, as long as the deficit is clearly temporary. But both the numbers and the administration's search for excuses tell us that there's nothing temporary about the red ink. On the contrary, we'll probably be on a deficit bender until the baby boomers retire — and then it will get much worse.
History suggests that Washington spends whatever it receives in taxes plus as much more as it can get away with.
Virginia Postrel pointed out that this story and this sidebar in USA Today seem to confirm Friedman's model, at least for state and local governments.
State governments are struggling to pay for expensive programs that were approved or expanded during the economic surge of the late 1990s. Although the economy began to cool in 2000, state and local spending has continued to grow, increasing by an annual rate of 4.2% in the first nine months of 2002.
Discussion Question. How would economists prefer to determine the level of government spending and taxation?
Discussion Question.
Copyright ©: 1999-2003,
Liberty Fund, Inc.
Great Questions of Economics: © 2002-2003, Arnold Kling. Originally published at http://arnoldkling.com/gqe/.
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 2.5.
The cuneiform inscription in the logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of
Lagash.
Picture of Arnold Kling courtesy of the author.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owners.
The URL for this site is:
http://www.econlib.org.
Please direct questions or comments about the website to
webmaster@econlib.org.