ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


From a policy standpoint temporary tax cuts make little sense. We need permanent cuts for them to really grow the economy. From a political standpoint, a temporary cut is all that Bush can get right now. Anything else needs 60 votes in the senate and there’s no way to get that done – the Democrats simply won’t allow it.
Bush will and should take what he can get. He’ll be back again every year to renew and extend the temporary cuts. And those will get easier and easier to pass year after year.
Do we really think that the estate tax cut will be allowed to expire? Will future congresses allow the marriage penalty to come back after being abolished for a few years? I don’t think so.
I feel it is incumbent upon me to throw a wicked curve ball over the plate. Is the tax cut really all that important? What about the near future increased oil drilling in Iraq? Won’t that alone be sufficient to significantly boost our economy? Might we actually be very close to an economic boom? Should I immediately seek residence in the closest loony bin, or am I truly broaching upon a subject which is in the back of everyone’s mind?
The war in Iraq was not directly about oil. Nonetheless, why be shy in admitting that this successful action will almost certainly improve the economies of most of the world?
Allow me to take a swing at your curve ball. Oil production in Iraq should ramp up over the next few years to about 6 million BPD. It was running in the 1.5 to 2 MBPD range prior to the war.
Crude prices shot up in the 6 months prior to the war because of uncertainty. OPEC increased production, but the market drove the price up anyway. Prices started falling the day the war started and the uncertainty was resolved. In addition, the oil fields were taken pretty much intact. 20 years of deferred maintenance has taken its toll on the production facilities, but things will get better every month from here on out.
The longer term question of oil prices would seem to rest on how much of the Iraqi production comes out of other OPEC quotas. If quotas are adjusted to handle Iraq’s increasing production, then prices will remain in OPEC’s preferred range or $25 to $28. If not, then over production will drop prices and make them quite volatile. We could see $10 oil again.
As for its economic impact, the US economy is much less dependent on oil than in the past. Not because we use less, but because the rest of the economy has grown so much. During the first oil price shocks, it was 8% of the economy. Now, it’s less than half that. It’s noticeable, but it’s not that big a deal anymore.
For the developing countries, it will be more significant.