ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I have consistently argued that governments will indeed have to continue raising the retirement age. After all, we live far longer today than was expected when these programs were originally conceived. Let us not forget that the average American man died at about 45 in 1900. We now have the bizarre situation where many folks will receive retirement benefits longer than they actually worked!
Alas, I must return to the awkward earlier point that this discussion primarily revolves around blue collars. Well educated professionals rarely, if ever, really retire. It is the factory worker with limited skills who ceases to contribute after they reach retirement age.
The great Mideast scholar Bernard Lewis is currently about 87 years old. He formally “retired” in 1986 from Princeton University:
http://www.princeton.edu/~nes/profiles/Lewis.htm
Just a few months ago, this scholar released another book, “The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror.” Lewis is the quintessential example of a white collar professional who did not simply retire and go off to pasture to die.
"Let us not forget that the average American man died at about 45 in 1900. We now have the bizarre situation where many folks will receive retirement benefits longer than they actually worked!"
I don't think that's true. Or more accurately, I think that's true ONLY because so many boys died in infancy or childhood in 1900.
A typical person, aged 45 in 1901 could expect to live to 70 (from It's Getting Better All the Time, Simon and Moore).
But it's definitely true that people who retire at 65 now typically live much, much longer than just to 70. Today's number was also in the book by Simon and Moore, but I forget what it was.