Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Garett Jones More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (2 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/37
The author at ProfessorBainbridge.com in a related article titled Ronald Coase Does Not Explain Howard Dean: Political Parties and the Transaction Cost Economics of Voting writes:
The author at QandO in a related article titled The information diffusion writes:
COMMENTS (8 to date)
Steve writes:
-->Is a reduction in communication costs the critical factor in Dean's success? Posted December 14, 2003 10:27 AM
Eric Krieg writes:
The critical factor in the Dean candidacy is RAGE. There are a lot of pissed off Democrats out there. They're pissed about Florida 2000. They're pissed about the tax cuts. They're pissed about "No Child Left Behind" (ask a teacher about it sometime to hear the rage). They're pissed about Iraq (probably more so now that Sadaam is in our custody). Basically, they're pissed that Dubya is OBVIOUSLY on a mission from GOD. And how can you compete with that? Posted December 15, 2003 10:04 AM
Steve writes:
Eric--I'll see your "RAGE" and raise you a "FEAR and LOATHING". Posted December 15, 2003 10:48 AM
Eric Krieg writes:
Fear and loathing it is. You remember who invented that phrase, right? Seems like the perfect poster boy for the Democrats. Johhny Depp even made a movie, perfect for the illiterate Democrat masses! In any case, the internet has nothing to do with it. In fact, Dean has come on strong only after "the mainstream media" discovered him. Posted December 15, 2003 10:57 AM
Steve writes:
Ghephardt will still give him a run. Gep's got my vote in the primary, unless Ross decides to jump back into the GOP and run. Posted December 15, 2003 11:02 AM
mcwop writes:
His success is due to rage, and blogs. Posted December 15, 2003 11:08 AM
Lawrance George Lux writes:
The cheaper Costs of communication have relatively little to do with it. Dean enjoyed many advantages before the Internet. He is an ex-Governor of a State, proving to the American people that he can administrate; remember, The American Electorate favors ex-Governors--Carter, Reagan, Clinton, George W. Bush. This prior Governorship introduced him to national Democratic leadership, and built his political campaign organization with its political contribution network. Dean would have been a Contender anyway. lgl Posted December 15, 2003 1:12 PM
Monte writes:
The GOP is more responsible for Dean’s success than low-cost communications. They’re behind the Dean media juggernaut because they believe he’s the ideal candidate for Bush to beat. He’s too far left for most voters, he approves of Bush’s foreign policy (regarding Israeli/Palestinian relations and our intervention in Liberia), and he’s polarized his party more than any other democratic candidate. Finally, in spite of all the hype about internet contributions, he’s not likely to raise enough money to contend with Bush’s $500 million campaign kitty. Talk about the perfect foil! I suspect there’s going to be a lot of cross-over voting done toy soldier republicans in the Democratic primary to ensure Dean gets set up for failure. In the spirit of the season, perhaps the RNC’s clandestine operations squad should rubber stamp this one “Operation: Nutcracker” (sorry). Posted December 15, 2003 3:04 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||