Econlib Resources
|
TRACKBACKS (3 to date)
The author at Knowledge Problem in a related article titled WALTER WILLIAMS ON SWEETS writes:
COMMENTS (4 to date)
george gilooly writes:
this was the subject of a businessweek cover story this week. "With their diverse workforces, American companies can field teams that speak Mandarin, Hindi, French, Russian -- you name it. As global software projects take shape, with development ceaselessly following the path of daylight around the globe, multicultural teams have a big edge. Who better than U.S.-based workers to stitch together these projects and manage them? "These people can act as bridges to the global economy," says Amar Gupta, a technology professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Sloan School of Management." [also see the many related items linked to in the sidebar on the right] Posted February 25, 2004 8:16 AM
John Thacker writes:
The answer to your question is obvious. If American companies are discouraged from using overseas software programmers, then overseas firms will employ them instead, taking advantage of any comparative advantage that the overseas programmers provide. In other words, the secondary effect will be to send the jobs overseas anyway, but with non American companies. Posted February 25, 2004 10:43 AM
David Foster writes:
Take an example: the market for enterprise resource planning (erp) systems. Say that American firms (PeopleSoft, etc) are discouraged from using overseas programmers. Meanwhile, the gorilla in this market, the German company SAP, increases use of low-cost sources (they already have a significant presence in Romania). PeopleSoft is laboring under a cost disadvantage relative to SAP. So what is the next step in protecting American jobs--banning imports of software that has components developed in low-cost countries? What would the effect of *that* move be on the competitiveness of American users of software? (not to mention the international political ramifications) One caveat, though: development costs for a software product are basically fixed rather than variable costs, so it might still be possible for the American company to be competitive. The use of offshoring for truly variable costs (support, customization) probably has more impact on competitiveness than does the use of offshoring for development. Posted February 25, 2004 11:14 AM
Lawrance George Lux writes:
Most look at this problem in the wrong way. The greatest effect would be the reduction of payscale of American Software programmers, rather than a total loss of their Jobs. American programmers who would not accept the pay cuts would be downsized. This is not really a topic of Comparative Advantage, but of realignment of Payscales. lgl Posted February 25, 2004 12:17 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures of Bryan Caplan and Arnold Kling courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||