October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus


One related item I've always not seen satisfactorily addressed is that self-interest can be defined in many different ways, and usually in ways that contradict the simple-minded materialism of economists. There often is some function being optimized, it is just as often _not_ the gluttonous acquisition of goods and services at the cheapest prices that so often starts off the analysis. Charity, ease of the transaction, etc. play a significant part.
Your purported weaker version of self-interest is actually the stronger version. Many Economists admit to this strength by continual referral to households in analysis, instead of the concept of the individual. Power in economic action comes from organizational structure. lgl
Actually, it is incorrect to say that the underlying assumption is that individuals simply seek to maximize their personal financial well-being. As Boudreaux points out, the assumptions are that people have preferences that satisfy some simple conditions.
But these preferences can be lots of things. To take a simple example, consider an individual who chooses to go home at five rather than work overtime. Even though this behavior does not maximize financial well-being, there is nothing about it that defies any economic assumption.