Library of Economics and Liberty masthead logo
 
Search EconLog
Recent Entries
Recent Entries by author
Bryan Caplan
David Henderson
Arnold Kling
Browse Archives
by date
by author
by category
Subscribe
About EconLog
Frequently Asked Questions
EconLog FAQ
Econlib Resources
About Econlib
Contact Econlib
Quote of the Day
Birthdays & Commemorations
Frequently Asked Questions
Get Econlib Newsletter
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)
RDF (Excerpts)
Feedburner (One-click subscriptions)
More
FAQ (Instructions and more options)
Return to top
Articles EconLog EconTalk Books Encyclopedia Guides Search
by Michael Munger
Guest Blogger
Economist Ray Fair's very simple model on presidential elections has some interesting things to say about the upcoming election. Given the macro-economic and macro-political factors that have mattered in the past, George W. Bush should win between 57% and 58% of the popular vote, according to the model. Any way that this happens implies a large Electoral College victory for Bush.

Here is the main estimation equation:


    VOTE = 55.57 + .691*GROWTH - .775*INFLATION + .837*GOODNEWS

You can simulate results by playing with your own assumed values here.

A note on the past: Fair's model predicted that Gore would win the 2000 election; and since "win" is defined in terms of popular vote, he was right! The prediction was that the Dem candidate takes 50.8% of the two party vote. The actual number received by Gore was 50.3%; pretty impressive.

CATEGORIES: Economic Methods , Growth: Consequences , Public Choice Theory


COMMENTS (4 to date)
George writes:

Let's hope that econometrics wins through again.

Posted August 14, 2004 11:56 PM
David Thomson writes:

Ray Fair's model, however, depends on our having a honest major media. Heck, we don't have that! The New York Times and the Washington Post lie like hell. President Bush has to overcome both the weaker John Kerry---and the corrupt liberal media.

Posted August 15, 2004 4:56 PM
Boonton writes:

Yawn, yea OK. Bush is suffering under the Evil Corrupte Liberal Media(tm) today in this age of Fox News while Gore, Clinton, Bush Sr., and Reagan enjoyed Platonically Pure Media Coverage?

More relevant, a single good prediction hardly makes a good model. Also, I find that '.837*GOODNEWS' a bit suspect. How objective is process to determine that rather subjective variable?

Posted August 16, 2004 9:11 AM
Vote Hound writes:

"There were thousands upon thousands of instances of election fraud committed by Republican operatives and the electronic vote was manipulated to favor Republicans. There is an ocean of evidence to show it."

Posted November 20, 2004 3:01 PM
Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top
Copyright © 2006-2009
Liberty Fund, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.

Liberty Fund logo, amagi symbol
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
spacer gif