Econlib Resources
|
TRACKBACKS (2 to date)
The author at Mahalanobis in a related article titled Japan takes self-service to a whole new level writes:
The author at The Raw Prawn in a related article titled Japan takes self-service to a whole new level writes:
COMMENTS (6 to date)
Brad Hutchings writes:
I sense that the club vs. silo hammer sees this as a nail. But this is all about costs that vary greatly from customer to customer. If there were a magic way to have the necessary support staff available to handle the support load at all times and simultaneously, to effectively charge per-incident support and on top of all that, not end up with a situation where support is underutilized to a point where it hurts sales... that would be the answer. This question really hits close to home this week!! Posted September 20, 2004 5:26 PM
shamus writes:
Computer-related companies view technical support as an avoidable expense. They should consider making products that are more reliable. Posted September 20, 2004 6:01 PM
Bill Fellers writes:
Am I an evil job-destroyer for providing tech support for my friends and family for free? If software companies make more reliable programs, many jobs would be lost. Does that make them evil job-destroyers? Are all relatively self-sufficient people destroyers of jobs? Autodidacts must be very anti-social, since they learn without paying teachers and often perform functions that others would have to hire someone else to do. Without the absurd ideas thought up by my fellow human beings, my life would be much less complicated, but also much more boring. Posted September 20, 2004 6:23 PM
Mcwop writes:
Why do computer-related businesses try to outsource technical support to their customers, and what alternatives should they consider? Because many charge extra for that service. Do it yourself, or buy the extra tech support. Posted September 21, 2004 6:53 AM
Dave Schuler writes:
We need to distinguish between outsourcing and off-shore outsourcing AKA off-shoring. Every company does some outsourcing—it's a good thing, economically efficient. Not all that many companies have their own in-house legal department, for example. They outsource legal services. Off-shoring technical support services is fine if it leads to equivalent or better technical support services at a lower cost. If not it's very imprudent and that's what happened at Dell, IIRC. It's even more imprudent when a company like a software company or pretty much any technology company that is dependent on intellectual property for its livelihood off-shores the creation of that intellectual property especially to countries where intellectual property laws are less-protective than ours, poorly enforced, or non-existent. The notion that a company is only off-shoring "junior engineer" positions is intellectually bankrupt. Where do they think "senior engineers" come from? Spring full-grown from the forehead of Zeus? It is interesting to note that in heavily regulated industries, such as medicine, little outsourcing takes place. You're conflating outsourcing and off-shoring. Practically all medical services are outsourced. Who has an in-house doctor or nurse these days? Except hospitals or doctors I mean. My own feeling is that we should very seriously consider relaxing the prohibitions against telemedicine. Retaining the prohibitions on telemedicine could perhaps be exchanged for strict self-imposed wage controls on physicians. Posted September 21, 2004 8:14 AM
Jeff Evans writes:
Why? Because the profit margin is so low one tech support call eliminates profit, and two calls causes a loss. Posted September 23, 2004 9:08 AM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures of Bryan Caplan and Arnold Kling courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||