BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


How should pharmaceuticals be regulated differently from computers?
Answer a Question with a Question: How should they be commonly regulated?
1) Both should be bonded for Malpractice award, if there is an inferiority of function.
2) All Patents should be issued to both and all, on the basis of a devisable unit royalty, with Production open to All in payment of royalty to Designers. (Let the Patents operate forever.)
3) Let entrance into the arena be quite simple, with passage of State Boards and provision of Bond. lgl
I don't consider it brilliant, I consider it idiotic. It is example number 3,478,212 of the Marxist-like libertarian habit of claiming that any deviation from ideology produces disaster.
Does Masten honestly believe that without the FDA we would be twenty years or so further on in pharmaceutical development? If so, maybe he tell us why instead of writing this junk.