October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus
How should pharmaceuticals be regulated differently from computers?
Answer a Question with a Question: How should they be commonly regulated?
1) Both should be bonded for Malpractice award, if there is an inferiority of function.
2) All Patents should be issued to both and all, on the basis of a devisable unit royalty, with Production open to All in payment of royalty to Designers. (Let the Patents operate forever.)
3) Let entrance into the arena be quite simple, with passage of State Boards and provision of Bond. lgl
I don't consider it brilliant, I consider it idiotic. It is example number 3,478,212 of the Marxist-like libertarian habit of claiming that any deviation from ideology produces disaster.
Does Masten honestly believe that without the FDA we would be twenty years or so further on in pharmaceutical development? If so, maybe he tell us why instead of writing this junk.