Econlib Resources
|
TRACKBACKS (3 to date)
The author at View From a Height in a related article titled Economics of Higher Ed writes:
COMMENTS (11 to date)
Scott writes:
I don't know why people are so attached to their colleges and especially their college sports teams. Maybe it's because I took a non-traditional route and dropped out for a few years before returning at age 25 to finish things up, but I don't feel that attached to my school. (And I really don't care much about sports.) For now, when they call me to try raising money, I dismiss them by telling them I'm still paying for my education. Not sure what I'll say in three years -- maybe I'll just give the standard and cranky, "I'm already paying money to the school through taxes." Posted January 30, 2005 9:42 AM
blaine writes:
I have two thoughts. Posted January 30, 2005 2:08 PM
Lawrance George Lux writes:
It is a blend of Tax credits and fund-raising organization. It can be attributed to be a 'full Court press' policy, where every previous Alumni is contacted almost Quarterly by Students hired by a contracted Fund-Raising organization. Students have a script like all Telemarketing, plus regular Issues of the Campus paper--containing heavy content on threat to Campus activities due to financial shortages. lgl Posted January 30, 2005 4:11 PM
Jon writes:
Colleges and Universities poor money into high visibility items like fancy buildings for the same reason that for profit companies poor money into stadiums or olympic visibilities. It is also the same reason a corporate executive spends hours of valuable time getting the powerpoint presentation looking nice--image and visibility matter for economic survival in both the for profit private, public, and non-profit sectors. Posted January 30, 2005 4:13 PM
A Swattie writes:
While perhaps a nice story, I'm not quite sure that it holds empirical water: Looking at the books on reserve for advanced micro., at least a quarter are post-1992. According to postings around the library, it acquired 1768 new books in fall 2004. The new book shelf has as many books as the campus has buildings (and books are rotated every two weeks). There are many things to accuse Swarthmore of, but not buying books is a rather bizarre one. Posted January 30, 2005 7:08 PM
Arnold Kling writes:
"According to postings around the library, it acquired 1768 new books in fall 2004. " You know, that really does not strike me as very many. I personally bought about 35 over that same time period. So fifty people like me together bought more than the Swarthmore College library. Or, to put it another way, they spent about $100,000 on new books in the fall, and at that rate they spend $200,000 a year. I wonder if that's even enough to merit a line item in the college budget. Posted January 30, 2005 9:04 PM
Another Swattie writes:
As an economics major at Swarthmore, I find your comments on McCabe's collection a bit unfounded. The economics books in Honors reserve are only a tiny tiny fraction of the total economics in the library's collection. On McCabe's second floor you'll find that the economics collection is quite copious. Perhaps your comments would be better directed at the person who put together the Honors reserve sections (typically professors who request that certain books be placed there.) But I can assure you that we have access to more "classics" as well as "forgettable" books that we have time to read. In addition to the books in the library we have next-day access to any of the books in the Tri-College system and slightly less prompt access to virtually any book through Inter-Library Loan. Swarthmore also subscribes to countless online services (like JSTOR) which give full-text access to many different journals. For a small liberal arts college I think we are very well off. You should be able to see the library's catalogue for yourself at http://tripod.swarthmore.edu/ I doubt there is much that you will not be able to find. Posted January 30, 2005 11:30 PM
David Thomson writes:
I am just an ordinary Joe Blow---and I probably bought at least a hundred books in 2004. 1768 books purchased by a university seems small by comparison. Posted January 31, 2005 6:07 AM
spencer writes:
To answer your question about why they give rather then books-- maybe it is because they can see a return to society for their donations to a school but find it hard to find where the church does much to improve society? Posted January 31, 2005 9:46 AM
Arnold Kling writes:
"You should be able to see the library's catalogue for yourself at http://tripod.swarthmore.edu/ I doubt there is much that you will not be able to find." When I taught this fall an introductory course at George Mason University, I assigned a book review. I gave students a list of 13 books to choose from. The books are listed here: When I search the Swarthmore catalog, 5 of those 13 books are not to be found. I do not think that is a very impressive result. I can find those books in the George Mason catalog. Posted January 31, 2005 11:41 AM
mark writes:
5304 books per year, if the 1768 books for the fall semester was carried out to include the spring and summer semesters. To which should be added journal purchases and gift books. Posted January 31, 2005 12:56 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures of Bryan Caplan and Arnold Kling courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||