On C-span last night, I happened to hear part of the State of California Speech. In addition to a recognizable name, the Governor of California has interesting ideas.
We must financially reward good teachers and expel those who are not. The more we reward excellent teachers, the more our teachers will be excellent. The more we tolerate ineffective teachers, the more our teachers will be ineffective.
...I can also announce that we intend to wipe out nearly 100 unnecessary boards and commissions, abolishing over 1000 political appointments in the process.
No one paid by the state should make $100,000 a year for only meeting twice a month.
In my view, government's biggest weakness relative to the private sector is its inability to reward success more than failure. The biggest reason that I believe private-sector education would prove superior in the long run is that I think it would tend to weed out failing teachers and failing processes in general.
Governer Schwarzenneger also proposes putting a judicial commission in charge of redistricting, in an attempt to take political gerrymandering out of the electoral process. I recommend reading the entire speech.
For Discussion. What are the arguments against the idea of merit pay for good teachers and firing bad teachers?