BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


I think perhaps the problem with Samwick's assertion is that he is refering to academic economics rather than economics as a science. In my college economics courses, the emphasis was always on optimization and equilibrium because that is what the underlying theory uses to break down problems for closer scrutiny. It was tacitly understood (though not emphasized nearly enough) that concepts like perfect competition or simplifications such as no trasactions costs do not exist in the real world.
Arnold,
Good essay. It occurs to me that greater value is being created by this and other blogs than by all the Ph.Ds combined. I say this because it seems to me that the greatest value of economics will be when its general principles are widely understood. Imagine all the socialists in the world suddenly developing entrepreneurial instincts. Also, if a Ph.D is all about the math, then most of them will be replaced by computers in the next few years.