ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I haven't had time yet to read the full 94 pages of this article, but the quoted section seems unremarkable. It amounts to the simple recognition that processing information is costly, and that people are therefore sometimes willing to pay a premium for a flat-rate package that relieves them from the burden of weighing every marginal cost.
On what basis can we conclude that such behavior is irrational, or that consumers "oversubscribe" to such packages?
A typical consumer only has so many hours in a day to determine the best deal. They may very well “oversubscribe” to package offerings---but there’s a point where the extra effort simply isn’t worth it. Traveling is stressful enough without spending hours worrying about each and every financial aspect of the trip. Isn’t my time valuable?
Coase strikes again.
How about people are rational because they know their enjoyment of something will be lowered by the automatic reflection of the opportunity cost for the item?
Once they've paid a flat rate for something, there is no tradeoff between enjoyment and price.
I don't mind that economists use "homo economus" to model economics, without them economists would sound a lot less authoritative. However, it scares me when economists suggest policy based on "homo economus" rather than on human beings. If somebody listened to them, people could get hurt :-).