October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus
The main factor here is Tenant injury to the Contracting party. The Individual's right to Privacy is limited from any attempt to gain personal betterment at the cost of loss to Another.
Posner's insurance issue is another thing altogether. The entire theory of Insurance is to take a General Pool, in which major factors can impose substantial costs, and spread the risk among all Participants. Do Insurers have the moral right to exclude Individuals from Risk-spreading because they have been proven to be a higher Risk than normal?
The Legal Right alters from the moral right, if all Insured (Risk-spreaders) face acturial Costs higher than statistical average, due to the addition of the higher-than-normal Risks. A difficult question. lgl