Bryan Caplan  

Anti-Foreign Bias Strikes Again

PRINT
The Case for Social Security R... Improving Student Evaluations...

The Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science blog features an interesting graph comparing the actual and perceived percentange of foreign-born residents in 20 European countries. Consistent with my research on anti-foreign bias, people overestimate the percentage of foreigners in every single one of these countries.

Can you guess what two countries seem to have the greatest overestimate? France doesn't surprise me, but Portugal?



COMMENTS (5 to date)
Maestro writes:

How does this show bias of an anti-sort? Anecdotally, most people I've ever talked about it with (including black people) overestimate the percentage of Americans who are black. Are black people anti-black? I think it has more to do with poor understanding of statistics and what we are more likely to notice than anything else.

Maestro writes:

Also, what happens when you switch the question around? What percentage of the population do people think is native-born? I bet we tend to overestimate that number too.

Sean writes:

Portugal explanation: Brazilian and African (Angola, Mozambique, Cape Verde) Portuguese-speaking immigrants.

John Thacker writes:

Maestro,

However, if you read the linked page, you'll see that overestimation by a person is correlated with greater opposition. So there is something there.

I am curious where the numbers for "actual" percentage come from. Specifically, I wonder how illegal immigrants are counted. If the "actual" really means "legal", then the perception might be the more accurate number, and the anti-foreign bias might be an anti-illegal immigrant bias.

Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top