BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


This sounds like a revival of the old-style "dread-disease" riders that were sometimes available with individual health policies. You're correct in saying that this is a genuine insurance product, not just because it covers large risks, but because it covers unpredictable risks (I know that's redundant, but you have to be specific in today's world of all-you-can-eat prepaid health "insurance").
Best of all, this type of product leaves treatment decisions in the hands of the patient and his or her physician/chiropractor/voodoo priest. On the other hand, I don't imagine that these policies get any sort of preferential tax treatment unless they're offered through an employer-sponsored plan, which throws a less-than-disinterested third party into the mix. Oh well...
A couple of thoughts. This could be a good thing if it leads to separate insurance plans for those who are merely sick and those who are critically ill. Critical care costs are huge, with questionable returns in terms of quality of life. We keep people alive for a few more months at tremendous cost, while the cost is subsidized by those who are less sick. Let the market determine whether people believe those extra months are worth the costs involved, and only provide that critical care for those covered by this kind of insurance.
The rest of us pay lower premiums for an insurance plan that does not cover extreme critical care costs.
AFLAC has made a small fortune selling cancer insurance policies in Japan.
Quack-Quack-AFLAC
Profile
I would wonder if having people choose which diseases to be covered for (assuming they're any good in predicting what they'll really get sick with) would in the long run divide up the risk pool and make the system unsustainable--for example if premiums rise to the point where it's too expensive for anyone with genuine illness to access insurance.
If they are lump sum payments, then it creates a big incentive to pretend to have some disease covered by the condition and collect the payout.
This is why insurers generally go to all the hassle of paying medical bills directly rather than just disbursing money. The set of people who would like a free knee operation just for fun is considerably smaller than the set of people who would like $10,000 just for fun.
Of course cancer, heart disease and stroke may be more difficult to imitate than a bad back, but still people's ingenuity is pretty amazing.