ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I don't normally post glowingly complimentary comments. But I just want to thank you for this article. The metaphor is perfect. I intend to use it to explain a number of econ basics to my wife that I've (thus far) failed to adequately convey...
But wait? Can I do this? Am I violating your intellectual property rights by re-using the metaphor that you created? Do I have your permission? Explicitly or implicitly? Do I need it? What are reasonable bounds on intellectual property? Should there be any bounds?
This is already a strong trend in business organizations. If you include management skills in what you call intellectual property it is what is now driving much of what is going on in business organizations. A modern firm takes something from a researcher in Europe, combines it with production in China, and distribution in North America to bring a product to market.
Isn't this exactly what you are talking about.
Moreover, the internet is making the modern era organization more efficient and moving the economy closer to the economists perfect competition model.
Given constant obesity aren't we eating the same food?
How does research and testing convert to a usable good without physical plant and equipment? By and large efficiency increases should be equal.