BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


But if the government were doing it, would that be wrong?
It depends on how government allocates the costs. If each passenger pays the same security fee (and the fee covers the costs of the screeners), but some passengers receive better service, I'd find that objectionable.
It is worth remembering that the 9/11 hijackers travelled first class. I don't have a problem with first class getting faster lines, but will they get more relaxed security clearance?
First class passengers pay higher ticket prices, so the airlines want to benefit them. Sure. But does TSA get more money from those passengers or from their airlines in exchange for giving them expedited treatment? It makes a difference how their privileges are funded.
Finally, why focus on first class? Let's have TSA have a high-price, fast-moving line than anyone can join, whether they are first class passengers or not. A question of interest: should that line be a club with dues (long term contract), or should there be a spot market so anyone can pay for line access at will?