ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


But if the government were doing it, would that be wrong?
It depends on how government allocates the costs. If each passenger pays the same security fee (and the fee covers the costs of the screeners), but some passengers receive better service, I'd find that objectionable.
It is worth remembering that the 9/11 hijackers travelled first class. I don't have a problem with first class getting faster lines, but will they get more relaxed security clearance?
First class passengers pay higher ticket prices, so the airlines want to benefit them. Sure. But does TSA get more money from those passengers or from their airlines in exchange for giving them expedited treatment? It makes a difference how their privileges are funded.
Finally, why focus on first class? Let's have TSA have a high-price, fast-moving line than anyone can join, whether they are first class passengers or not. A question of interest: should that line be a club with dues (long term contract), or should there be a spot market so anyone can pay for line access at will?