Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Garett Jones More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (9 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/357
The author at William J. Polley in a related article titled Bryan Caplan gets cynical writes:
The author at Indefinite Articles in a related article titled Humorous Economics post of the day writes:
The author at The Club for Growth Blog in a related article titled Gasoline Prices writes:
COMMENTS (5 to date)
Eric writes:
Suppose that they cut gas taxes $0.30/gallon but that the price at the pump only dropped $0.15/gallon because of inelasticities. Would the effect be to mitigate or accentuate calls for other forms of controls given that the public has zero understanding of tax incidence? Posted September 12, 2005 9:39 PM
Mike Linksvayer writes:
Increasing gas taxes may be politically viable if pitched well ("we all have to sacrifice"), would not be doing nothing, and may be better than price controls. Posted September 12, 2005 11:10 PM
Timothy writes:
Ye olde political economy at work. Posted September 13, 2005 9:28 AM
Chris Bolts writes:
While true that increasing gas taxes should curtail consumption, Mike, in America it is almost certain to be political death for the politician who suggests it. A price control sounds much better to the the masses even if the economic rationale makes sense. Posted September 13, 2005 2:55 PM
Paul Bonneau writes:
Bottom line: No one is going to listen to the politician who says "Do nothing." Under the circumstances, I can't think of a single politically viable policy that would be better than cutting the gas tax. So you're suggesting that any legislator who votes against a gas tax cut is going to be thrown from office? I find this implausible, except for the case where he is otherwise in trouble. Politicians don't have to say "do nothing". They just have to vote the right way on the bills. If people call them on it, they just have to ask those people how road maintenance is going to be funded - absent a complete sell-off of the roads to the private market. It's not hard to make the case that those who use the roads should fund them. That's what the gas "tax" is, a user fee. Posted October 1, 2005 10:15 AM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||