Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Garett Jones More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (1 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/354
The author at Armchair Analyst in a related article titled Emotionomics - Evolution in Motion? writes:
COMMENTS (1 to date)
Brad Hutchings writes:
Bryan, you've ignored alpha/beta behavior in your explanation. A very good case can be made that some groups of animals survive particularly well because there are dominant members in their packs. Individually, they all might look like their going into their corners and not satisfying what their needs should be. Collectively, they thrive because of it. George Bush may not care about short people, but he has moved the WOT to the other side of the planet for now. Too bad he can't actually declare war on hurricanes. Anyway, William Whittle's recent Tribes posting seems particularly relevant. There is an extremely wide variance of the kinds of emotional behavior you are trying to account for, leading to very different roles in a pack or tribe. Posted September 10, 2005 3:20 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||