Welcome to the new EconLog design.
Econlib Resources
|
TRACKBACKS (9 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/350
The author at ishkabible in a related article titled Price gouging? writes:
The author at Grandinite in a related article titled Gas Price Variance Up! writes:
The author at matthewstinson.net in a related article titled Price gouging … isn’t writes:
COMMENTS (7 to date)
The Eclectic Econoclast writes:
Another reason for a wide price spread is that after a supply shock of uncertain magnitude, individual businesses have trouble estimating the market-clearing price. The higher variance that you have observed might have been the result of imperfect and incomplete information. Posted September 5, 2005 7:52 PM
Bill Stepp writes:
The reason for the increased variance in the price of gas is the increased uncertainty in the market. Will controls be introduced? Will the SPR be tapped? How long will refining capacity be reduced? When will it return to its pre-Katrina level? Posted September 6, 2005 7:13 AM
Shivering Timbers writes:
There's another reason: supply disruptions may be very localized. On a national scale, this is obvious, since southeast states saw significant supply disruptions when their pipelines from New Orleans shut down; while those of us in the Midwest saw little disruption (most of our oil and gas comes from Canada). But even on a local scale, when refineries and gas terminals go on allocation, they may give higher priority to certain stations (those with contracts and owned by the same parent), while other stations go to the end of the line. The result can be that one gas station has plenty of fuel, while another across the street has a hard time keeping its tanks from running dry. Posted September 6, 2005 8:24 AM
Dale writes:
Another explanation is that many stations continued with their existing pricing policies, which are probably based on either the price paid for the last shipment they received, or more likely, the price they have already negotiated for the next shipment. For stations that negotiated a price before the price from their suppliers went up, there is less immediate pressure to raise prices. Furthermore, they certainly know that many customers will continue to buy from a familiar station unless they have an incentive to switch. Thus, if they don't have to increase their prices above their competitors at a later date, they may capture some new customers by not raising their prices immediately. Simply put, some stations are probably making very rational decisions about foregoing immediate profits in anticipation of increased volume in the coming months. That may be a very important factor in sustaining their businesses if consumers cut back on their use of gasoline. If we assume that the demand for gasoline is relatively inelastic in the short term, which intuitively seems likely, consumers may cut back on other purchases. Those could easily include other items purchased at gas station convenience stores. Posted September 6, 2005 10:23 AM
dsquared writes:
It is more likely that the station owners are using mark-up pricing on inventories of differing vintage. Posted September 7, 2005 1:55 AM
jameson writes:
I will have to agree in part with dsquared by saying that I believe the reasoning is based largely on remaining inventory. In the case of the Centreville Shell station that made its way to the national news hour, the gas station was using price to make its existing inventory last. The lower the level, the higher the price. Those stations expecting to have received their inventory replenishments earlier than others were like to raise their prices higher. Posted September 7, 2005 9:15 PM
Jon writes:
Prices would only be very close to each other in an equilibrium. When there is a shock, it takes time for a new equilibrium to be set. Free markets don't keep businesses from making bad decisions, they just insure those that make too many bad decisions disappear. Posted September 11, 2005 6:20 AM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures of Bryan Caplan and Arnold Kling courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||