Econlog Main | Archive Main | Help and FAQ | Search
Specific Archives: Date Archive | Author Archive | Category Archive
« Our Vast Oil Reserves | Kurzweil Interview | Hummel Reviews Woods »

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Read Comments (1)

TrackBacks (0)

Categories

More articles by Arnold Kling

SEARCH


Advanced Search

RSS FEEDS

Subscribe to EconLog's news feed:

RDF (Excerpts)
XML (Full articles)

FAQ (What are these RSS feeds all about?)

Register for Econlib's monthly newsletter

September 2, 2005

Kurzweil Interview


Glenn Harlan Reynolds interviews Ray Kurzweil, who generically answers my objection to his forecasts.


to achieve the software designs, we need to reverse-engineer the human brain. Here, progress is far greater than most people realize. The spatial and temporal (time) resolution of brain scanning is also progressing at an exponential rate, roughly doubling each year, like most everything else having to do with information. Just recently, scanning tools can see individual interneuronal connections, and watch them fire in real time. Already, we have mathematical models and simulations of a couple dozen regions of the brain, including the cerebellum, which comprises more than half the neurons in the brain...By the mid 2020s, it’s conservative to conclude that we will have effective models for all of the brain.

So at this point, we’ll have a full understanding of the methods of the human brain, which will expand the toolkit of techniques we can apply to create artificial intelligence. We will then be able to create nonbiological systems that match human intelligence in the ways that humans are now superior, for example, our pattern- recognition abilities. These superintelligent computers will also be able to do things we are not able to do, such as share knowledge and skills at electronic speeds.


The interview is wide-ranging and interesting.


RETURN TO: Econlog Main | Archives | Top of page

READ MORE: Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

CATEGORIES: Growth: Consequences (74)


Instructions / Advanced Search

COMMENTS (1 to date)

Chris writes:

Sorry, but Kurzweil is once again overly optimistic about our ability to understand the human brain. We are nowhere near understanding how the conscious mind works, let alone how to mimic this in silico. There are many pharmaceutically-important classes of compound whose mechanism we do not understand. I think Arnold's objection still stands.

Posted September 8, 2005 06:39 PM

TRACKBACKS (0 to date)

RETURN TO: Econlog Main | Archives | Top of page

READ MORE: Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)