Welcome to the new EconLog design.
Econlib Resources
|
TRACKBACKS (3 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/396
The author at Jacqueline Mackie Paisley Passey in a related article titled Spending habits and poverty writes:
COMMENTS (11 to date)
Deb McAdams writes:
For the price of one hardcover book one can purchase about three softcover books. You choose the hardcover books. My guess is many poor families make the opposite(?) choice. I'm not sure how you became so virtuous, but I'd have to say you are a model for us all. Posted November 14, 2005 12:26 PM
L. Skywalker writes:
I do not have cable TV What kind of economist can't afford cable TV? Posted November 14, 2005 12:35 PM
Ed Basta writes:
You were correct in not persuing the Claritas option. My company purchases some environmental data from them, and the more I try to validate it the worse it gets. I agree that your hardback book would correlate with income, but I would be interested in determining if it predicted wealth. I think most wealthy people probably would rather use the library than purchase books. Posted November 14, 2005 1:23 PM
Timothy writes:
L. Skywalker: There's a difference between can't afford and doesn't want. Posted November 14, 2005 3:05 PM
Don Lloyd writes:
Ed, I agree that your hardback book would correlate with income, but I would be interested in determining if it predicted wealth. I think most wealthy people probably would rather use the library than purchase books. Buying new hardback books instead of paperbacks, at least for fiction, is likely to reflect a strong time preference. This would also work against library use for the same titles due to delayed availability. Regards, Don Posted November 14, 2005 3:46 PM
Bernard Yomtov writes:
Actually, I don't think Arnold said he particularly bought hardback books, just that he bought books. He may have been using hardbacks as a sort of index of the opportunity cost, in books, of cable TV. Or not. Do hardback prices vary less than paperback prices? Just guessing, I would think so. Posted November 14, 2005 5:32 PM
John P. writes:
The effect of time in choosing between hardback and paperback is a good point. Another cause may be that higher-income folks buy more books that are issued only in hardback, such as art books, specialized reference books, etc. Posted November 14, 2005 6:05 PM
L. Skywalker writes:
Timothy, Don't tell me you can't afford cable, either?! Luke Posted November 14, 2005 9:33 PM
phil writes:
Take a closer look; there might be no real difference: Posted November 15, 2005 12:44 AM
dsquared writes:
I've seen a village in Africa where they didn't have clean water but they had saved money to buy a TV satellite dish. So what? I thought the whole point of being an economist (cf, Bryan's post, two posts above this one) was to get away from the irksome task of having to sit in judgement on everyone else's purchase decisions. (on the subject of footwear, it was pretty clear from a minute's thought that average age and family size was going to explain this one) Posted November 15, 2005 8:45 AM
Paul N writes:
Maybe poor people go to the library. I've checked out hundreds of hardcover books without ever buying one. Posted November 15, 2005 1:18 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures of Bryan Caplan and Arnold Kling courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||