January 5, 2010
The Economics of the Microsoft Case
January 5, 2010
The Economics of Illegal Drugs
January 5, 2010
Intellectuals and Society
January 5, 2010
Thinking Outside the House
January 5, 2010
FP2P Watch
January 5, 2010
The Books I Wish My Colleagues Would Write
January 4, 2010
Predictably Irrational or Predictably Rational?
January 4, 2010
My Sowell-mate on the Knowledge-Power Discrepancy
January 4, 2010
FP2P Watch
hmmm, AD on HBO, that would be just crazy enough to work.
Unfortantly Network execs are a jelous bunch. Rarly do they let a show go to the right station. They would rather bury the show and move on then release it to people that know what to do with it.
It's funny how businesses would rather bleed to death than admit that their project(s) are a failure. I see this same mentality with Democrats over their "cherished" social programs.
Chris,
Let us be honest we ourselves.
The Democrats do not have a monopoly on " ......death than admit that their project(s) are a failure...."
Hmmm do they take into account the fact that Pay-Per view makes it possible for people to watch Rome whenever they want? Maybe I am the only one.
Nor do they mention The Wire, perhaps better than even the Sopranos. Rumor has even Gary Becker watches the Wire...
If only they'd been willing to chase the investment of Carnivale. I'm not sure I can ever forgive HBO for cancelling that.
Then again, I remain an avid Twin Peaks fan, so maybe I just have a thing for Michael Anderson. :-)
They are avoiding the sunk cost fallacy? Isn't part of the fallacy wrongly continuing with something because so much has already been invested in it?
p.s. Is "the Wire" still on? I saw the first season, that show was awesome.