Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Arnold Kling More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (1 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/397
The author at www.productivityshock.com in a related article titled Adbusters writes:
COMMENTS (16 to date)
KipEsquire writes:
I would substitute "Netflix" for "HBO," but otherwise you're spot on! Posted November 14, 2005 9:10 PM
Scott Nesbitt writes:
I concur. The combination of XM Radio, ReplayTV, and Netflix removes me from most audiovisual advertising. On the downside, I got tired of not being able to discuss the rare _good_ commercial at work, so I have begun to sample one now and then to be sociable. Posted November 15, 2005 10:27 AM
Lord writes:
I have noticed broadcast TV now seems to have fewer commercials than your average cable channel (not HB0). One way to make their value greater apparently. Posted November 15, 2005 11:14 AM
Hunter McDaniel writes:
Yes, spend $18/month on Netflix as a replacement for the $5/month DVR and the $14/month HBO. And if you live close enough to the city to get Digital TV reception, you can drop your cable subscription as well - another $30 to $50. Netflix has everything that's any good on HBO except what they're showing THIS YEAR. Patience has its rewards. And, of course, Netflix gives you access to everything else that's any good (of which HBO has only a small part). About the only things I watch on broadcast TV anymore is SPORTS, and for that a DVR is useless - I really have no interest in watching a game that's already over. Posted November 15, 2005 12:51 PM
Paul N writes:
I know I'm in the minority but I often find ads as interesting as movies or TV. I think they tell us stuff about ourselves, the way we are going, what we value. Note: I don't have any use for seeing the same ad more than once or twice, so I also use a DVR (if you hate fast-forwarding through commercials, you should build your own Myth-TV-based system - it skips through them automatically). Certain magazines (e.g., W, Vogue) are only really interesting for the ads, and who doesn't love the creative Mini or Hitachi ads they stuff into magazines? Posted November 15, 2005 1:14 PM
Rafal Smigrodzki writes:
One more layer of anti-commercial shielding that is worth mentioning is the use of browser helper apps, capable of selectively removing commercials from www content. I am using Proxomitron, with excellent results, being able to get rid of 90% of commercials, and almost all blinking content (which is known to induce raving madness). Grrr! The XM-linked, DVR-shielded, Proxomitron-proxied users (like me) can live their lives almost totally unmolested. Posted November 15, 2005 2:23 PM
Marcus writes:
A dollar a day? Wow. That's not much more than the $300 "donation" that will get me a two year subscription to Adbusters and a "Friend of the Foundation" package. https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=283 Don't forget to discourage people from buying (or, more importantly, buying into) Adbuster's ethically ambidextrous sanctimony on Buy Nothing Day. Posted November 15, 2005 9:39 PM
Paul T writes:
Adbusters is the sort of self-deluded marketing fraud that gives capitalism a bad name and makes Madison Avenue look like the very picture of judicious clear-eyed sobriety. Posted November 15, 2005 11:41 PM
Marcus writes:
Blackspot Sneakers (under the "Blackspot" brand name don't-ya-know). Self parody? Or cynical marketing ploy? http://www.adbusters.org/metas/corpo/blackspotsneaker/ Who says radical progressives don't provide a positive alternative? Posted November 15, 2005 11:49 PM
bree writes:
My fiance and I have been mulling getting ourselves a DVR for Christmas this year. I'm only really annoyed by commercials when they're too repetitive or when the premise of them is insulting, but it would be nice to have the option to skip them. This discussion relates really well to a book I picked up recently, The Rebel Sell: Why the culture can't be jammed, by Joseph Heath & Andrew Potter. I'd definitely recommend it. Posted November 16, 2005 3:55 AM
mobile writes:
Dear Prof. Caplan, I visit your blog to hear your insights into economics and how they apply to the issues of the day. But I didn't come here just so I could read a bunch of ads for XM Radio, Dish Network, and HBO. Please cancel my subscription immediately! Posted November 16, 2005 12:21 PM
Ivan Kirigin writes:
The less-legal options abound. For music they have been around for a while. For movies, you can download them, but often quality is poor. You can get a DVD burner for less than $100. Then you increase your netflix throughput by burning and returning them immediately. You don't have to wait to watch it first. For $19, you can get ~20 DVDs a month (more than most people can watch), and actually get to keep them, for ~$10 for the DVD-Rs. Posted November 16, 2005 4:29 PM
Toby Evans writes:
Dear Professor Kaplan, Not central to my argument, I think our federal government is bloated, especially the military/DOE/Homeland Security, while local governments - which primarily help people rather than kill them - are underfunded. That's why I suggest a local tax, but federal or local, the advertizing tax and exemption for political advertizing is still a good idea. Posted November 17, 2005 8:17 AM
Scott writes:
Government has to get its revenue from somewhere. Perhaps they should consider getting it the way the rest of us do: by asking rather than taking. Posted November 18, 2005 3:14 AM
Marcus writes:
One more thing about Adbusters. During "Buy Nothing Day", I went to Fry's Electronics and picked up a 80 Gig hard drive for $0 (after rebates). Had I listened to high-minded harpies at Adbusters, I would have missed out on an opportunity that may only arise once or twice a year. I would now be one 80 Gig hard drive poorer than I am now. Posted November 26, 2005 4:22 AM
Brian Macker writes:
What! I never got any back! Posted December 3, 2005 2:04 AM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||