Econlog Main | Archive Main | Help and FAQ | Search
Specific Archives: Date Archive | Author Archive | Category Archive
« Would a Cancer Vaccine Pay? | Reviving Political Economy | Mankiw's Wish List »

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Read Comments (1)

TrackBacks (0)

Categories

More articles by Arnold Kling

SEARCH


Advanced Search

RSS FEEDS

Subscribe to EconLog's news feed:

RDF (Excerpts)
XML (Full articles)

FAQ (What are these RSS feeds all about?)

Register for Econlib's monthly newsletter

January 3, 2006

Reviving Political Economy


From my latest essay:


The mainstream approach treated economic behavior and political behavior completely differently. We viewed economic phenomena, such as a price change, as determined by an entire system. We took political decisions as arising from personal whim. We viewed market behavior as determined by contextual factors, notably tastes, technology, and competition. We treated political behavior as an independent causal force. In statistical jargon, we viewed economic phenomena as endogenous and political phenomena as exogenous. In describing markets, we used the term "equilibrium" to suggest that there is an inevitability to economic patterns. In politics, we acted as if any day policymakers could change directions at will.

I suggest instead that we need theories of political behavior, such as "public choice" theory.


RETURN TO: Econlog Main | Archives | Top of page

READ MORE: Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

CATEGORIES: Public Choice Theory (42)


Instructions / Advanced Search

COMMENTS (1 to date)

Bill Stepp writes:

Constitutional provisions are not barriers to government misconduct. At best, they can be speed bumps.

Far from being even a speed bump to government action, the Constitution is actually a facilitator, as a perusal of the Commerce Clause (Art. 1, sect. 8) shows.
That part is just a to do list for the government.
Why those provisions for state action were allowed by the so-called Founders is a mystery (except that those functions were done by the British government). It gives the lie to historians who claim they were pro-free market.

Government in commerce? No thanks.

Posted January 3, 2006 02:23 PM

TRACKBACKS (0 to date)

RETURN TO: Econlog Main | Archives | Top of page

READ MORE: Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)