ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax
SHARE
His achievement was a rationalization of the policies already practiced and the "conventional wisdom" he ironically mocked. What he really did was to write an apology for the prevailing policies of governments, no wonder it was an instant classic.
My nomination for harmful folk-economic belief- greedy capitalists caused the Great Depression, heroic FDR saved capitalism from itself.
Excellent essay, thanks. I think you may have been a little unfair to Herman's Hermits, though.
One of the mantras in the financial press is that the consumer is 2/3 of the economy.
Is this true, or is it an urban legend with no basis in fact?
His achievement was in facing the way the world worked and not the way people believed it should work.
Who defines a clear thinker? I presume that clear thinkers are those who agree with and support your ideas?
What percent of the population knows Keynes?
I too am tired of the shibboleth that the American economy is dependent on consumers. I'd think that it's dependent on workers.
If we're all working, we'll spend our income somewhere, somehow, some way. Who knows? We might even save it -- and that would be bad too I suppose.
The consumer accounts for 2/3s of the economy.
Ok, we do not measure gdp or output directly.
what we do is measure consumption and adjust that for changes in trade and inventories to indirectly estimate gdp or output.
So as a consequence of the way we calculate GDP
people say the consumer accounts for 2/3s of the economy. But actually, they account for 2/3s of consumption , but 0% of production. Things like chemicals, semis, oil, etc., account for production, but we just do not measure it that way.
One of the reasons the accounts are done this way is that they were first created after the depression when the main economic, policy concern was inadequate consumption so that is what policy makers wanted to focus on.
Is the consumer 2/3 of the economy? Depends on how you count. They get that figure by breaking down the GDP. The GDP claims to avoid "double counting" by counting just the valued added at each stage of production. But as Prof George Reisman demonstrates in his book, "Capitalism," the GDP measures net output, not gross. The BEA agreed with Reisman and now includes a figure called GO, for Gross Output, alongside GDP. Using GO, consumer spending is less than half of the economy.
I believe the "paradox of thrift" fallacy goes back at least to "The Fable of the Bees" by Mandeville. Are there earlier versions?
Nice piece.
Two comments:
As Josh Lyman said: Don't know Herman's Hermit's it's hard enough to get on the charts.
James Glassman. Dow 36,000. Made me smile.