Econlib Resources
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||
Small correction: According to the document you linked, the halving time of 32 years corresponds to a fertility rate of 1.1. For 1.3, the halving time is 44 years.
Point still remains, and fascinating article.
I believe that "problems" like this correct themselves. I predict that Italy and Japan will have a fertility above 1.8 by 2050.
Why should the problem be necessarily self-correcting on any time scale but the very long run? As seniors become a larger fraction of the population, the tax burden they represent to working would-be child-rearers grows, and so the means of families to have more children shrinks.
At least one demographer has hypothesized that there is a low-fertility trap. At least to date, no country has come back from below TFR = 1.5.
http://fistfulofeuros.net/archives/001748.php
It would be interesting to know what happened in other historical episodes of population decline. For example, Greece between 0 to 400 AD and Rome a little later.