Econlib Resources
|
TRACKBACKS (12 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/498
The author at Tim Worstall in a related article titled Quote of the Day writes:
The author at Market Power in a related article titled For Someone's Office Door writes:
The author at Houston's Clear Thinkers in a related article titled LBJ on Ee-co-nomics writes:
The author at U.S. Politics: Current Events in a related article titled Reflections on Galbraith, Political Economist writes:
COMMENTS (6 to date)
guggis writes:
BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAH, that is soo true. Posted April 20, 2006 10:15 AM
dearieme writes:
"his assistant Nicky Kaldor that ‘Allied bombing..by destroying civilian enterprises, released labour for the [German] war effort’": I'd always taken that argument at face value, but now that I know that Kaldor and Galbraith were its proponents, ah hae ma doots, as Galbraith might not have said. Posted April 20, 2006 11:01 AM
Charles Cox writes:
It's a darned shame economics has had such a uniformly drab image in the hearts and minds of so many. What's the deal? Type M versus Type C? No bad guy/good guy in economics = snoozefest? Posted April 20, 2006 12:34 PM
liberty writes:
>It's a darned shame economics has had such a uniformly drab image in the hearts and minds of so many. I am convinced that its just a matter of a good writer with a very sensible approach writing a book that combines *actual* economics (not political jibberish) with common sense and readability bringing another economic renaissance; Milton Freedman, Reagan and the libertarians brought one, but another is needed to help it last through this period with the current distracted public. Posted April 20, 2006 1:23 PM
john pertz writes:
Ive often wondered if Marxism's only function as an economic ideology is to try and inject politics into a science which is largely a political. If you are a political person then classical and even neo-classical economic theory is a huge road block. If the arguments contained within those doctrines is true then politics is ultimately useless as an ideology of progression. Therefore Marxist arguments that economic teaching is a way to enforce the dominant ideology is largely unsurprising. Posted April 20, 2006 10:50 PM
Lisa writes:
I hear from the older generation that this kind of crassness was quite typical of LBJ. Apparently, he liked to make people follow him into the bathroom and keep them talking to him while he did number 2. He’d say something like “keep talking, I’m just going to take a dump here in the stall”. Posted April 22, 2006 11:21 AM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||