Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Arnold Kling More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||
Another excellent post, Dr. Kling. I have been trying to clarify in my mind what the effects of the "contango" situation are with respect to producers' incentives and this nails it.
Yeah, why isn't anyone picking up on this? Iran jumped the shark yesterday with its pledge to ship nuclear technology to Sudan. As if they hadn't already with dancers holding vials of enriched uranium. What if Iran has basically bluffed the price of oil up? Even Chavez in Venezuala doesn't think it's sustainable -- witness his recent proposal for a $55/barrel fixed price. So what if Iran is just bluffing the price up, then gets UN sanctions slapped against it, then gets attacked by Israel and the US? What happens then to the price of oil? In a time of war, they can't possibly want to shut off their cash cow. In summary, Iran's President ain't half as smart as he thinks he is.
I like this theory. It's very plausible. It's in Iran's interest to be a percieved threat, but never an actual one.
But how long can they play that game, eventually we have to call their bluff whether they are developing weapons technology or not. Just like Iraq.