Econlog Main | Archive Main | Help and FAQ | Search
Specific Archives: Date Archive | Author Archive | Category Archive
« Greg Mankiw has a Blog | Still More on Immigration | Revealed Preference vs. Happiness »

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Read Comments (6)

Post a Comment

TrackBacks (0)

Technorati Links

Categories

More articles by Arnold Kling

SEARCH


Advanced Search

RSS FEEDS

Subscribe to EconLog's news feed:

RDF (Excerpts)
XML (Full articles)

FAQ (What are these RSS feeds all about?)

Register for Econlib's monthly newsletter

April 3, 2006

Still More on Immigration


My latest essay uses the N-word.


What should you call someone who wants government to provide for our education, competitiveness, and health care but whose concern about "us" stops at the border? The obvious label would be national socialist. But George Bush and Paul Krugman are not Nazis...

The alternative ideology that I would propose might be called transnational libertarianism. The ideal libertarian world would have no economic borders. There would be no problem of illegal immigration, because all forms of immigration would be legal.


RETURN TO: Econlog Main | Archives | Top of page

READ MORE: Comments (6) | TrackBacks (0) | Technorati Links

CATEGORIES: Labor Mobility, Immigration, Outsourcing (39)


Instructions / Advanced Search


Harald Korneliussen writes:

To be fair to them, their concern does not quite stop at the border. There is such a thing as foreign aid.

Posted April 3, 2006 07:39 AM

Gabriel Mihalache writes:

"But George Bush and Paul Krugman are not Nazis..."

Error! Error!
Does not compute! Does not compute! :-)

Posted April 3, 2006 07:46 AM

Robert Speirs writes:

If immigration restrictions are wrong, why do all countries in the world have them? And if weak, unenforced US restrictions are bad, why aren't the immigration rules almost everywhere else worse? Why would countries, especially poor countries, harm their economies with strict immigration controls? Yet most do.
And is it entirely irrelevant that the crime rate among illegal immigrants is much higher than that among citizens? Do you favor admitting violent felons?

Posted April 3, 2006 08:28 AM

nn writes:

I'm not sure which definition of little l or big L libertarianism is being invoked, but I thought that even in a Nozickian world, groups would be allowed to agglomerate, self-select, and restrict entry to their group. Why can't we call some of those groups "nations"?

Posted April 3, 2006 09:35 AM

Tom Anger writes:

The ideal libertarian world would be governed by a unified rule of law. That rule of law would protect citizens from predators -- including government-sponsored predation (e.g., welfare programs). To the extent that immigrants come to the U.S. because it offers "better" welfare programs, those immigrants are engaging in predation and enabling the election of politicians who would multiply the predation. Your prescription works in the ideal world, but not in the real one that we inhabit.

Posted April 3, 2006 10:18 AM

JohnDewey writes:

Robert Speirs,

Have you seen any evidence that the crime rate among illegal immigrants is much higher than among U.S. citizens? I've been searching for that but cannot find it.

I have seen statistics showing that the crime rate for Hispanics is slightly higher than for the overall non-Hispanic white population. The problem with those statistics is that the majority of the Hispanic population are either citizens or legal immigrants. The second problem is that those statistics are not age-adjusted. Most crimes included in such statistics are those committed by teenagers and young adults. The average age of the Hispanic population is lower than the non-Hispanic white population, so naturally the crime rates will be higher.

An additional problem with focusing on crime statistics is that such statistics ignore many other social problems. Abuse of family memebers and abortion are two statistics that would be important in determining the desirablilty of any ethnic group. As Mexican Americans strongly embrace family values and religion, I doubt their family abuse and abortion rates would be near as high as many other ethnic groups.

Please note that I'm referring to Mexican Americans, both legal and illegal, and not to the broader group of Hispanics that includes criminals deported by Castro, Columbian drug dealers, and Puerto Ricans who have grown up in our U.S. culture of entitlement that suppresses individual achievement and accountability.

Posted April 3, 2006 10:28 AM

TRACKBACKS (0 to date)
For MT or Typepad blog authors, the URL to ping (i.e., the Trackback URL for this entry) is
http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1456

RETURN TO: Econlog Main | Archives | Top of page

READ MORE: Comments (6) | TrackBacks (0) | Technorati Links

Post a comment on this article
First time here? See the Instructions.
Before posting a new comment, have you read:











Shortcuts for some browsers: click to make your selection bold click to make your selection italic click to make your selection an indented quote click to add a link More info


(Preview required before posting.)



Clears your Name, Email address, and URL.