Library of Economics and Liberty masthead logo
 
Search EconLog
Recent Entries
Entries by author
Bryan Caplan
David Henderson
Arnold Kling
Browse Archives
by date
by author
by category
Subscribe
About EconLog
Frequently Asked Questions
EconLog FAQ
Econlib Resources
About Econlib
Contact Econlib
Quote of the Day
Birthdays & Commemorations
Frequently Asked Questions
Get Econlib Newsletter
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)
RDF (Excerpts)
Feedburner (One-click subscriptions)

Subscribe by author
Bryan Caplan
David Henderson
Arnold Kling  
More
FAQ (Instructions and more options)
Share



Return to top
Articles EconLog EconTalk Books Encyclopedia Guides Search
Arnold Kling  
PERMANENT LINK | MAY 9, 2006

Re-read Group Power

Arnold Kling
PRINT
Share SHARE
Wealthy Ugandan Expats... "Virtually Bone from the Neck ...

Max Borders rightly criticizes a proposal for an international agency to effect nation-building.


A disconnect between the donors and the recipients means that information feedback loops get lost. The structure of the behemoth makes it virtually impossible for that agent effectively to respond to the (often divergent) needs of the principles...Since quasi-governmental behemoths are composed of personnel (and interests) from many nations, they are susceptible to the problems of rule by committee: inaction.

However, Borders falls into a trap himself when he concludes that when we find ourselves embroiled in failed states,

[we] should also be establishing the essentials for prosperous and highly organized complex order: the Rule of Law; an independent judiciary; transparency and accountability mechanisms; a separation of powers; popular sovereignty (constrained by the rule of law); and fixed, enforced property rights.

But those institutions are not pre-requisites for modernization. They are results. Re-read my essay Group Power.


Comments and Sharing


CATEGORIES: Institutional Economics


   

COMMENTS (4 to date)
liberty writes:

If your theory is true, how do you explain Japan after WWII - democracy and freedom and equality before the law was imposed from above by the United States. Before that they had an emperor and no institutions built from the bottom up.

If it can work in Japan, it can work in Iraq.

Posted May 9, 2006 3:34 PM
Morgan writes:

Max Borders from Boone?

Sounds like your style of writing.

Posted May 10, 2006 11:45 PM
Max writes:

Arnold, while I think you're right about the indogenous formation/evolution of institutions, I don't think they're HAVE to be evolved. I hold out hope for institutional gene-splicing.

But suppose you're right that all institutions should bubble up in evolutionary fashion like the Hanseatic league or the Common Law. Then should war be a bomb 'em and leave 'em affair? After all, that's what Barnett is trying to figure out (the post-war effort).

Posted May 11, 2006 7:42 AM
Arnold Kling writes:

I don't think that we built Japan from the bottom up. Certainly William Easterly would not put it that way.

As for whether war should be a "bomb 'em and leave em' affair," that gets us into the realm of foreign policy, which is outside of where I want to take the discussion on this blog.

Posted May 12, 2006 4:19 PM
Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top
Copyright © 2003-2011
Liberty Fund, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.

Liberty Fund logo, amagi symbol
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
spacer gif