BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


Wow! I'm flattered. I'm not sure how much more fruitful a Calhounian approach would be for a libertarian economist at a state institution. Your position is an exceptional one. It will be interesting enough to see.
But for most of classism.org's target audience, I think such an approach would be helpful for getting over the bogus notion that antagonistic classes are defined by income levels.
I am not sure the distinction helps to think about the problem. If most people feel that government produces too little economics teaching and research you are probably a net producer.
If most people think government produces too much of whatever it is you produce you are probably a net consumer (of taxes).
It would be pretty easy to test this Marxist theory with a short survey and a regression.
In the survey get some basics on the class background (combined num,ber of years of education of parents & grandparents, average income of parents during first 20 years of life, etc) and some basics on political philosophy (prefer flat or progressive income tax, belive social programs should be expanded or reduced, believe its governments role to ensure basic income, etc).
But, to do it properly, you'll have to control for where the person lives, rural or urban, state and country, at the very least and also what the parents political philosophy is - eg democrat/republican/socialist and perhaps the person's family faith and some other factors.
I think if you did this, you'd find a much stronger correlation with where the person lives and the philosophy of his parents than you would with his class background.