For generations (actually, for millenia) homosexuals have been persecuted both in democracies and nondemocracies... This tiny minority is still held in open contempt, even disgust, but many members - probably most - of society. Nevertheless, it has gradually been able to undo a great deal of official persecution in democracies in the space of only a couple of decades.
If is significant that this change took place only after homosexuals came out of the closet and openly organized to advance their interests... [O]nce a minority organizes responsibly to put forward its demands, democratic governments are often remarkably responsive. And it is quite possible to imagine that other contemptuously dismissed groups... like drug addicts and prostitutes, and, increasingly it seems, cigarette smokers - could obtain similar redress if they organized and worked on it.
The political mechanism here is obscure. Do oppressed minorities thwart the majority with single-issue voting, or shame the majority into changing its preferences? Or maybe it's only about shaming the elites?
In any case, Mueller's conclusion has a ring of truth it to. I remembered it during this year's pro-immigrant rallies, and thought "This may be the beginning of the end of immigrant bashing." Middle America hated the rallies, just like it hated the first gay rights protests. But if immigrants keep publicly complaining for twenty years, I bet they'll gain a lot of ground.
Similar gatherings have occurred just twice. In January 1870, some 6,000 women gathered at the Salt Lake Tabernacle for what they dubbed the "Great Indignation Meeting," to protest anti-polygamy laws. In 2001, a mixed group of fundamentalists lobbied the Utah Legislature as it debated marriage laws.