ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax
SHARE
Skeptical. Rather they have value here because there is a need here. There isn't much need for them there since there is little demand or development. It is less a lack of business expertise than of an affluent population in need of their services.
It is installed infrastructure. We can pack workers efficiently into these massive cities and sort of put them asleep for years with little marginal cost. These are drones, and we can wake them up for menial tasks and put them back to sleep and still have a decent return on investment.
"Noble goals"? Pish-tosh. So-called public schools were conceived as instruments of social control. Their primary purpose is to train the mass of men to be obedient subjects of the state and willing, docile serfs for corporate managers and bosses. A good place to start your research would be with the system as it was being established. Here's an essay by anarchist de Cleyre about the effects and purpose of the school system:
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/voltairine_traditions.html
Carson's blog also has the occassional comment about the school racket:
http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2006/08/are-citizens-tame-humans.html
Vive le liberte!
[N.B. Rodriguez12 is also posting under other nicks on EconLog, including the banned nick Anonymous2. See the comment thread under Silent Signals for current info.--Econlib Ed.]
Ties in nicely with the assertion that education is overrated and merely a signalling model largely to compensate for the infamous Griggs Vs Duke Power 1971.
Also, if Milton Friedman is right on his 'Free to Choose' Video series, Hong Kong soared with hardly any "formal education" infrastructure.
Well, so much for "No Child Left behind". I would suspect that the main supporters of that fiasco were business executives who just got a tax cut, and so bought into cheap government.