ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I've been a critic of Florida's "creative cities" theory for four years, but he's definitely onto something here. There is a concentration of the highly educated in certain cities. The problem with his Atlantic article statistics is that he's not breaking out non-Hispanic white population, where this is most clearly visible. The concentration of well-educated younger whites in certain cities then attracts in a very poorly educated class of Hispanic immigrants to service them, thus diluting the effects when looking at the overall populations.
I agree with Sailer. Flordia just might be on to something. If you think for a sec, Flordia just might make a little sense. The industry market has been and is growing, which does draw immigrants and farmer into industrial area. But on the same token families desire the suburbs as opposed to centrally located in cites. I can see why Kling distrusts media stars in social science, because I tend not to distrust them period. But here in my opinion Flordia makes a plausible hypothesis, but not a good foundation for building a Strong conclusion, well put Kling!