Econlib Resources
|
CATEGORIES:
Growth: Causal Factors
, Institutional Economics
, Labor Mobility, Immigration, Outsourcing
TRACKBACKS (2 to date)
The author at Pienso... in a related article titled Smarter international aid (i.e.: more migration) writes:
The author at Mike Linksvayer in a related article titled Gains from open borders writes:
COMMENTS (9 to date)
AJ writes:
We need more Frederich Hayek and less Jeffrey Sachs. Posted September 18, 2006 11:12 AM
CS writes:
Since America's (relatively) high economic freedom is dependent on the attitudes of its electorate, utilitarians have a powerful reasons to resist the addition of new citizens opposed to its institutions. Certainly in the case of the Mexican immigrants at issue with respect to the current amnesty/legalization plan, the evidence indicates a much greater average hostility to markets than native-born citizens. http://www.vdare.com/sailer/060917_silicon_valley.htm If the ability to beneficially absorb immigrants is limited by the damage done to productivity-enhancing institutions, then immigrants should be selected to get maximum 'bang-per-buck.' Immigrants with high human capital will experience greater incremental productivity gains from American institutions, and be more likely to support continued economic freedom. So why not encourage unskilled illegal immigrants to leave via employer sanctions and a border wall, while allowing H1-B's and other skilled worker types to become permanent residents and citizens? Alternatively, one could adopt a 'guest worker' model, where foreign unskilled labor could benefit from American institutions without voting rights, but that seems politically unsustainable and rather unsavory. Posted September 18, 2006 11:33 AM
Matt writes:
Yes, Arnold gets it. It is cheaper, right now, to move the squirrels than move the acorn technology. Then what are the goals of the economic organism, the problem CS hints at? Well, we are governed by evolution, and evolution likes to expand biological work. As long as evolution can produce more acorns in North America than Central America, evolution will send us more squirrels. When central America has a large reserve of acorn producing resources, relative to North America, then we will invade Central America, using military means if necessary. Posted September 18, 2006 12:05 PM
Dezakin writes:
"Alternatively, one could adopt a 'guest worker' model, where foreign unskilled labor could benefit from American institutions without voting rights, but that seems politically unsustainable and rather unsavory. " Thats sort of how it works today. Immigrants dont vote unless they're rich enough to buy citizinship, and then tend to vote for markets anyways; But the concept that americans are somehow fundamentally pro-market seems flawed to me. American institutions are slightly pro-market, but of americans themselves, they'll vote for whatever the wind tells them is in style. Mexicans fundamentally changing the structure of the democracy into mexico is yet another canard by xenophobes used to justify jingo. Posted September 18, 2006 2:08 PM
Lord writes:
Clearly the solution is to start drafting natives and export them to developing markets to remake the situation there. I'll volunteer Arnold. Posted September 18, 2006 2:16 PM
SimpsonMazzoliBadJoke writes:
I'm going to outsource my comment to this guy. http://snarkybastards.com/index.php/2006/09/18/who-needs-democracy-when-youve-got-development/ For what Mallaby isn't telling you (or doesn't know) about remittances, see my (TruthAboutRemittances) comment here: prospect.org/weblog/2006/09/post_1426.html For an example of the thinking of those who support "reform" in general, click my link. Posted September 18, 2006 3:02 PM
Steve Sailer writes:
You'll notice that countries that get a lot of remittances from abroad per capita, such as Mexico and the Philippines, are much slower to reform themselves than countries that don't, such as China and India. Remittances subsidize the survival of corrupt, inefficient domestic systems. Posted September 18, 2006 3:05 PM
John S Bolton writes:
The rights of the net taxpayers of the richer countries, not to have aggression increased on them, get all too conveniently left out of account. Posted September 19, 2006 4:02 AM
Martin Kelly writes:
Who gives a rat's backside about the GDP of Guatemala? Really? Come on! Posted September 19, 2006 3:27 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures of Bryan Caplan and Arnold Kling courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||