Econlib Resources
|
TRACKBACKS (1 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/559
The author at Economic Investigations in a related article titled GMU, the New Chicago? writes:
COMMENTS (10 to date)
Scott W writes:
This list looks a lot like Milton Friedman's in "Capitalism and Freedom." Posted September 13, 2006 7:09 AM
Justin writes:
This is why I love Mason. Posted September 13, 2006 7:53 AM
Lauren Landsburg writes:
Hi, Scott W. You said: This list looks a lot like Milton Friedman's in "Capitalism and Freedom." I'm looking at Friedman's Capitalism and Freedom but not finding the list you refer to. Do you have a page number or other reference? Posted September 13, 2006 7:58 AM
RogerM writes:
I would vote for eliminating the Departments of Energy, Education and HUD and the Small Business Administrion. Posted September 13, 2006 8:55 AM
Lauren Landsburg writes:
Russ Roberts relayed that the page Scott W. may be referring to is at the end of Chapter II. of Capitalism and Freedom, 1962, U. of Chicago Press, pp. 34-36. It reads as follows:
I think Friedman's list and ideas were a tremendous influence on current thought, but the route of that influence may have been via face-to-face communication and word of mouth rather than that exact published list. Posted September 13, 2006 10:04 AM
Cliff writes:
Interesting that neither property rights nor freedom of commercial speech are mentioned. Posted September 13, 2006 11:22 AM
Dezakin writes:
It would be most useful to discover why things like the softwood lumber dispute exist before we tackle larger problems such as agricultural subsidies and then medicare. The canadian/american softwood lumber dispute rewards a tiny lobby with punishing tariffs on canadian lumber, raising the operating costs of housing and other fields that rely on inexpensive lumber. Its fairly obvious to see how the politics of social security are self-perpetuating on ignorance and fear, but I can't see at all how the softwood lumber dispute has gone on with the electorate being apathetic about it and much larger lobbies (construction and housing) bearing significant costs. Posted September 13, 2006 3:52 PM
Kent Gatewood writes:
Given the size of the trade deficit, it is hard to believe there are significant tariffs and quotas left. Any data would be appreciated. On agriculture would country of origin labels be feasible? I'm not sure I want to buy food from Iran or North Korea. Limiting the discussion to federal spending is annoying. My wife is a professor at a private university, and I might be able to consume at a higher level if she weren't competing against subsidized state universities Posted September 13, 2006 5:20 PM
Mr. Econotarian writes:
It would be nice if someone would link a list like this with relevant supporting research references! Posted September 14, 2006 5:05 AM
liberty writes:
Why is Medicare/Medicaid not in the privatization list? I would also like to see welfare in there, though I appreciate the "all job training and workforce assistance programs" bit. These should be permanent lists that we refer to every year before compiling the budget, each time moving closer to completely privatizing and liberalizing these areas before allocating any taxpayer money to any area. Posted September 14, 2006 1:22 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||