Econlib Resources
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||
We could just wave.
Actually, as one possible kind of "virtual handshake", I recall that in
the movie Demolition Man, they didn't shake hands for real anymore, so
what they did was this: You would hold out your hand flat, palm facing
the other person, your hand in front of theirs roughly, and then you
would make a few circles in midair (i.e., in a plane parallel to that of
your body) with your hand. That's weird, but at least it kind of
resembles a wave. Just thought you might want to know.
Handshakes are fine; the key is not to bring hands to eyes, nose, or mouth after handshaking but before washing hands. The transfer of viruses from hands to mucus membranes is what causes colds. (Hope I'm not stating the bleeding obvious.)
Sorry to hear you're sick.
You should live in England, where people don't touch much - I can go weeks without shaking anyone's hand.
Actually, the touch is part of the meeting of two people. People touch. Among other things a handshake indicates to each other that you do not think they are lepers whose touch can kill.
But, but ... if you shake hands virtually, how can I be sure you're not armed?
There's worse. I recall reading about a tribe in New Guinea (I think) whose men cupped one another's testicles as a sign of greeting. Hard to beat as a way of showing trust, I guess.
Even a lepers handshake does not kill, although people believed it in those times. Only continuous exposure to leper can infect other people.
But this aside, there is another medical reason for handshakes, they transfer germs! How silly this might sound, it is one of the things that keep your anti-body system prepared to deal with sicknesses.
If you hadn't been in contact with people from an early stage in your life, you would be rather easily infected by any kind of virus.
So, exchanging germs is not as bad as you might think :)
Heh,
I must be a geek because the first thing I ever thought was the Vulcan split-finger "Live long, and prosper" greeting.
Which is also suitable for economists!
So Brian, if I ever see you - Live long, and prosper!
Och, just lift your kilt to them.
The simplest and most respectful is to do "Namaste" as the Hindus do. Just greet each other from a distance joining your palms and raising them a little bit. Looks good too.
well i feel a firm handshake is necessary when you meet an elder or someone of a professional buessiness. Its a matter of how cautious you are. Bring purel around with you and never tough your face. When it comes to familiar people you know there may just be an exchange of words or a nod. Germs are everywhere arnt they! your not going to be getting them just from peoples hands but railings and doors, etc.
I think that the vitual handshake could be a good thing. Americans today give germs and they do not even know it. There is no telling how many times a person shakes someone elses hand. Everytime they do then they spread whatever germs they have to that person. We are not as clean as we think that we are. The virtual handshake to me shows more respect to the person whom you are greeting. It shows that you have enough respect not to give them the germs you have.
If we eliminate the handshake from American popular custom, how will I be able to instantly spot those who are obsessive about germs? My reaction to someone like that is not "What a considerate person!" but rather "I wonder what other aspects of their judgement are unbalanced?"
Yeah I must agree with you totally on this subject at hand. Infection is really serious these days when you don't even know what could be on the other persons hand. But, going back to morals which is alot of what America was founded on, "shaking hands is just part of life." Also, in order for it to change their will have to be something givin up like the good feeling you have when you shake someones hand after selling them your product or etc.
I'm surprised Bryan has succumbed to the notion that germs 'cause' disease. Germs are there, here, everywhere, all the time. Perhaps they are slightly more concentrated on your hand if you happen to be sick, but they are not absent from your hand if you happen to be well.
I, for one, want to shake Bryan's hand when he is sick. I want to shake everyone's hand when they are sick. The exposure to a few germs my body's immune system has not yet developed resistance to will give me increased protection from sickness in the future.
Of course there are a few outlier diseases I do not want to come in close contact with (Black Plague springs to mind), but for the most part I benefit from exposure to other people's new, for me, germs.
This assumes I have kept myself in healthy shape through exercise, nutritious diet, sufficient sleep, etc.
By the way, I have averaged one cold or flu episode every 7 - 10 years, for the last 55 years.
Please, Bryan! Shake my hand!
You will get germs from every thing you touch in your every day life. You can not control how many germs you come in contact with every day most of them you don’t even realize are around you. I believe it is very important to shake someone’s hand for the first time you meet them because you can tell a lot about a person form just a hand shake.
Yea it sounds to me that we are a little afraid of germs. Germs are just a part of life, and how do you know that you got sick from shaking someones hand. You really dont know why or how you got sick, but I see this whole New hand shake thing as just weird lets just stick to what works. A good old fashion hand shake to seal the deal.