BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


When I was a child in the 70s, the idea that I should have something just because I wanted it was considered, well, childish. How old is Klein anyway, 5? I guess that some people never grow up.
So... what's the thinking on situations where someone is just not a good fit for insurance - i.e. they're a known risk? Say, someone with aids, a genetic condition, that sort of thing... ? How do you make the market work for them?
There are a number of ways of handling known risks. Here are a few.
The insurance payments are negotiated for some term into the future in advance, and cover the possibility of someone becoming a known risk.
When a person becomes a known risk, they receive a one-time payment representing the expected costs of treating their condition.
When a person becomes a known risk, the insurance pays for their enrollment in a case-management system for that particualr illness, which essentially is the previous, with the uncertainty in the length and efficacity of their particular treatment transferred from the patient to the health-case provider.
If health insurance were real insurance, you would have "whole life health insurance" which you could purchase for your entire life as well as "term health insurance" of 5-10 years.
Your premium would depend on your age, weight, health, and smoking status before entering the insured period.