ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


What performance measurements would those be?
I can see purely computational hiring logic working for baseball and even for student admissions. But for many other fields, no one has been able to build an objective ranking system that works. What "simple performance measures" would you use?
You can tell Sunstein's a big baseball fan-"Does he throw fast?"
Next he'll be asking if the referees argue with the coaches a lot, and how many points there are per home run.
“People’s overconfidence in their ability to read someone in a half-an-hour interview is quite astounding,” said Michael A. Bishop, an associate professor of philosophy at Northern Illinois University who studies the social implications of these models."
This is from an article in NYT, "Maybe we should leave that up to the computer" by DOUGLAS HEINGARTNER, July 18, 2006, about how much better statistical models perform at a variety of managerial tasks than do managers. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/18/technology/18model.html?ei=5090&en=2a9cf863f7b789b8&ex=1310875200&adxnnl=1&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1156036218-mG8lGLGXMgZfdipY5hx+kA
Maybe universities should humble themselves a tad and come up with similar models?