BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


That does indeed appear to be an unfortunate choice of words on his part.
The reason why healthcare premiums are going up is because of the increased cost and quantity of healthcare services being consumed. Testing for rule-out diagnoses. Laparoscopic procedures that improve safety and decrease costs-per-surgery, but therefore increase utilization and reduce the value of the marginal surgery. Miracle treatments for wet macular degeneration. Vaccines to eliminate HPV among the next generation. Etc., etc.
Healthcare insurance purchases a wider range of coverage than it ever has before. That is to say that an individual's expected medical and pharmacy costs have increased, even after rising member cost sharing provisions. And these rising insured costs cover an ever-growing array of physically available and utilized services. It is difficult to translate that reality into a normative statement about "better" treatment.
This is not to say that we, our insurance companies, and our government are appropriately or efficiently incentivizing a complex healthcare delivery system, as you discuss in CoA. But by framing this issue in terms of healthcare premiums, Tyler does seem to elide the fundamental resource allocation problem.
Nothing fundamentally new in my thoughts here, I know, but your point deserved reinforcement.