October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus


With all due respect to Will Hutton, the Chinese would have said, if asked at the beginning, China did not "carry on while adapting its model, living without democracy or European enlightenment values." If asked today, they would diagree also with Hutton's "soft" institutions hypothesis. The consensus among Chinese is that China always had a very strong substitute for Europe's enlightenment in a range of other historical constructs, including Confucian values and Buddhist and Daoist ideologies.
To my Chinese friends here in Hong Kong, "how people are educated, how trust relations are established and how accountability is exercised" would sound very close to repeating verbatim from the Analects by Confucius.
They also might point out that the herald of accountability, the independent civil servant or Mandarin who obtains his position through merit rather than court favor or heredity, was a Chiinese construct. As Voltaire himself observed, enlightenment Europe did not have an equivalent of the Chinese Mandarin. This theme has been explored in depth by Professor Martin J. Powers at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and by the Washington Post journalist T.R. Reid in his excellent book "Confucius Lives Next Door."