Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Garett Jones More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (1 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/647
The author at Economic Investigations in a related article titled News of the World #22 writes:
COMMENTS (9 to date)
Daniel Klein writes:
Nice post. Thanks. I just picked up the book at Barnes and Noble. Posted February 11, 2007 11:44 AM
Nathan Smith writes:
While we're on the subject of libertarian history, would Barry Goldwater have supported the Iraq War? He told the 1964 Republican convention: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." Sounds a lot like George W. Bush. Ayn Rand also thought that any free country had the right (not the duty) to attack and overthrow any unfree regime. I've been trying to figure out for a while now whether the "realism" of the Cato Institute is libertarian tradition or an innovation. Posted February 11, 2007 11:28 PM
Ryan Fazio writes:
Ironically, Mr. Smith, I was just going to mention Ayn Rand. It was Ms. Rand, i beleive, who coined the term 'radical for capitalism'--that is what she identified herself as. And youre right on what you said of her foreign policy views: any free nation is justified in invading an unfree one. But she would also say that it is altruistic (and therefore bad) to go to war unless you are doing so in self defense. i believe that neither goldwater nor rand would approve of the iraq invasion, but even moreso the way the war was conducted, because it was lazy occupation in the name of democracy rather than a total war for the unconditional surrender of islamists. i believe that both would have supported an overthrow of Iran's government because they are the true ideological and material source of the terrorist threat. But as to the point of my post, I am not positive, but as i said i believe ayn rand coined the term 'radical for capitalism' and i was wondering whether mr. doherty credited her for that. after all he used it in his title and even if her presidence carries no legal bearing it would only be honest to acknolege the idea did not origionate from his own mind. ryan Posted February 12, 2007 12:54 AM
Wild Pegasus writes:
I believe declaring the triumph of libertarianism is, sadly, rather premature. - Josh Posted February 12, 2007 10:31 AM
liberty writes:
"and i was wondering whether mr. doherty credited her for that. after all he used it in his title and even if her presidence carries no legal bearing it would only be honest to acknolege the idea did not origionate from his own mind." I believe he does. At least thats how it seems from the reviews http://www.nysun.com/article/47255 Posted February 12, 2007 10:53 AM
Ryan Fazio writes:
thnx for that liberty--great article. i wanted to watch doherty on cspan last night but i got home too late. o well, i guess ill have to buy the book...it looks very cool. Posted February 12, 2007 11:26 AM
Brian Doherty writes:
I acknowledge Rand's invention of my title phrase on page 15--and possibly elsewhere as well. Posted February 12, 2007 2:31 PM
Russ writes:
you can view Doherty's After Words interview at http://www.BookTV.org Posted February 13, 2007 5:30 PM
Mike Huben writes:
What Triumph of Libertarianism? Libertarianism used conservative ascendency to pretend that it had some influence. There's never been any evidence that libertarians have increased in number over the past 30 years or so: the closest thing we have to evidence is the recent decrease in Libertarian Party membership. As for "the scourge of the blogosphere", I cover that in my Libertarianism in One Lesson: "Libertarianism "rules" Internet political debate the same way US Communism "ruled" pamphleteering." Posted February 15, 2007 8:04 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||