October 3, 2008
Is Ignorant Dogmatism Possible? I'm Afraid So.
October 3, 2008
The Lamps Are Going Out
October 3, 2008
What If the Median Voter Were a Failing Student?
October 3, 2008
Credit Default Swaps
October 3, 2008
How Government Used Fannie and Freddie
October 2, 2008
The International Angle
October 2, 2008
Cochrane and Rogoff on the PBS News Hour
October 2, 2008
Henry Waxman's Hearings
October 2, 2008
Economists' Bipartisan Bailout Opposition


I have to disagree it is more like a jungle than it may appear to be from the surface. After all it's a dog eat dog world out there! Hostile corporate take overs, disasters like Enron where 1000 of families were displaced, insider trading, overstating assets in order seem more pleasing to investors: these are all examples of the modern day plight of living in our concrete jungle, either you find your place in it or find yourself prey.
At bottom, until you've gotten to a certain level in the hierarchy, it *is* a competition to live. If you don't have any accumulated capital, nor any skill that someone will pay you to exercise (IOW, you've really lost big in the competition for "cooperation") -- in the absence of charity or government intervention you're going to starve to death.
Markets abstract this competition into a less immediately deadly realm, and in the process make it possible for many more people to "win" and generally create enough wealth so that many fewer people (God willing, eventually none) end up starving to death. That said, they don't change the essential nature of the competition for survival.