October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus


I have to disagree it is more like a jungle than it may appear to be from the surface. After all it's a dog eat dog world out there! Hostile corporate take overs, disasters like Enron where 1000 of families were displaced, insider trading, overstating assets in order seem more pleasing to investors: these are all examples of the modern day plight of living in our concrete jungle, either you find your place in it or find yourself prey.
At bottom, until you've gotten to a certain level in the hierarchy, it *is* a competition to live. If you don't have any accumulated capital, nor any skill that someone will pay you to exercise (IOW, you've really lost big in the competition for "cooperation") -- in the absence of charity or government intervention you're going to starve to death.
Markets abstract this competition into a less immediately deadly realm, and in the process make it possible for many more people to "win" and generally create enough wealth so that many fewer people (God willing, eventually none) end up starving to death. That said, they don't change the essential nature of the competition for survival.