Bryan Caplan  

Should There Be Compulsory Attendance for the Balan-Hanson Debate?

PRINT
The Sociology of the V.R.W.C.... Alternative Energy and Rent-Se...

David Balan and Robin Hanson, two of the smartest voices on Overcoming Bias, are having a debate on Paternalism this Wednesday evening at GMU. The title: "Paternalistic Policy: Altruism or Arrogance?"

Given that this debate will resolve this important question for all time, I have to ask: Should everyone in the region be required to attend?


Comments and Sharing





COMMENTS (7 to date)
jcolter writes:

A debate at 6:00 in the evening? That makes it pretty much impossible for those working in the district to attend. If it were at all feasible I would certainly go.

So maybe the solution is to force my entire office to attend.

Phil writes:

If everyone *anywhere* is required to attend, and expenses are paid ... I'm there!

Ajay writes:

How paternalistic of you! Clearly you're on Balan's side.

mobile writes:

Forcing everyone to attend would be counterproductive. It would only create a black market in alternative Wednesday evening activities. I think the children would lose out the most.

David writes:

I would suggest that it be compulsory for those nearby whom are the subjects of this debate.

David writes:

Bah, that should be who, not whom.

Zachary Skaggs writes:

Ack! Arg! Would definitely love to see this (and the rest of the GMU econ staff in hot debate action), but prior plans dictate. Sooner notice next time?

Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top