BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


Arnold, are you aware of the "Tufts method" of gaming the rankings? It entails: rejecting students with very high SAT scores to look good (as you said, a school that rejects good applicants must therefore be good) with little worry about the loss of good students - they probably wouldn't land them anyway. At the same time, this increases their "yield": most of these students are going to Ivies and are only using Tufts (or other school applying strategy) as a safety school.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_protection
My college's dean of admissions once asked me how to reduce our acceptance rate without changing the size of the entering class. My five word answer:
Stop charging an application fee.
Sean is absolutely correct about colleges rejecting high-scoring SAT applicants.
In 1995 I was rejected by the University of Washington with 750 verbal/730 math SATs. The moral I drew -- and the story I told for several years -- was that an out-of-state white male didn't stand much of a chance at admission.
How wrong I was! I did not know until much later that my SATs would have gotten me into a number of top-tier schools. UW was the only one I appliead at, for personal reasons. Had I included an explanation along with my application, I might have gotten in.
Fortunately, in 1996 I got a job as a management consultant based on my work experience. Now I am semi-retired on a sailboat in the Bahamas. So things can turn out OK, even for a high-school dropout.